On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 15:04, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, David Turner wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 00:19, Anthony Towns wrote: > >> Well, they try to anyway. If there's no copying taking place, I fail > >> to see how it can apply, whether it tries to or not. > > > > Because the preparation of derivative works is one of the exclusive > > rights of copyright holders. Please read 17 USC 106 (2) again. > > Yet again, it is not enough to cite 17 USC 106 (2), without citing 17 > USC 107 and the caselaw based on 17 USC 107. > > Anthony is quite reasonable in presuming that the current > interpretation of "Fair Use" applies to cases where there is no > copying taking place.
I think this is fundamentally unsound, given Texaco. I gave an actual Fair Use analysis in another message. -- -Dave Turner Stalk Me: 617 441 0668 "On matters of style, swim with the current, on matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson