On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 03:41:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > authors special consideration. Furthermore, I think the most effective > way -- perhaps the *only* effective way for our "deprecation" of such > licenses to be more than just lip service is to reject them as violating > the "spirit" of the DFSG, or if you'd rather, as violating Social > Contract clause 1 even if the DFSG wasn't comprehensive enough to snag > them. > > And no, I don't have any expectation that everyone else on this mailing > list shares my opinion on this issue.
I think you have a valid point; at the same time, we should have expressed it at the time Troll was drafting the current QPL. Now is, I think, too late to go back on that decision. There is value in being trusted. -- John