Jeff Licquia writes: > Let me try to improve on Branden's version, phrased a little differently > so it becomes a new 5.a.2: > > "The entire Derived Work, including the Base Format, does not identify > itself as the original, unmodified Work to the user in any way when > run." > > This would be accompanied by a section under "WHETHER AND HOW TO > DISTRIBUTE WORKS UNDER THIS LICENSE" talking about ways to ensure that > derived works can adhere to 5.a.2. > > I'd really like to hear Frank or David's thoughts on this new wording, > since we're moving into some different territory here. What do you > think?
as I said in the other mail, I think that would be something I think would do what is necessary and we could give suggestions elsewhere how to fullfil 5.a.2. Guess i need to think a little bit more about it to be sure, but it seems likely. Would be fine if it does. frank