Many examples have been given for why this is *false*, and they're
pretty much all tied to the *non-removability* rather than the
non-modifiability. Should we repeat them again?
I've looked at these reasons, and they did not convince me the first
time; repeating them won't convince me now. Recently I have started
sending mail discussing the issue, explaining why this is too strict a
standard.
This is the point on which Debian has consensus and cannot compromise.
You seem to be anticipating a decision which has not yet been made. I
doubt I can convince you, but I hope I will convince other Debian
developers to reject this proposal.
