Frank Mittelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes:
>  > 
>  > It is my opinion, on first read-through, that this version would
>  > satisfy the DFSG.  I hope others will agree.
> 
> Branden Robinson writes:
>  > At first glance this looks really good, and probably satisfies the
>  > DFSG.  
> 
> I would appreciate if others (I think remember Walter and Mark) had some
> concerns with the last version would take a look too.

It looks good to me.  Thanks a lot.

Regards,
Walter Landry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to