Frank Mittelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes: > > > > It is my opinion, on first read-through, that this version would > > satisfy the DFSG. I hope others will agree. > > Branden Robinson writes: > > At first glance this looks really good, and probably satisfies the > > DFSG. > > I would appreciate if others (I think remember Walter and Mark) had some > concerns with the last version would take a look too.
It looks good to me. Thanks a lot. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]