John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > compelling interest in being able to distribute a modified RFC822?
RFC2822, you mean? ;-)
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach MJ Ray
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Lynn Winebarger
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach MJ Ray
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Lynn Winebarger
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach John Goerzen
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach John Goerzen
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach John Goerzen
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach MJ Ray
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Matthew Garrett
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach John Goerzen
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Matthew Garrett
- Re: Inconsistencies in our appr... Matthew Garrett
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- OT: Documentation as a Program [Re: Inco... Don Armstrong
- Re: OT: Documentation as a Program [... Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: OT: Documentation as a Prog... Don Armstrong
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Nathanael Nerode
- Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Joe Moore
