On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 17:27, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Sunday, Aug 24, 2003, at 10:10 US/Eastern, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > > > One thing we are sure about, is that, according to RMS, FSF is aware > > of the GPL compatibility problem and is going to work this out, as soon > > as it gets enough manpower. > > Considering how much they seem to want to keep, e.g., invariant > sections, this worries me. > > Adding a "you may use this under the terms of the GPL, either version > two or later..." takes next to no manpower; rewriting the GPL to *add* > invariant sections takes a lot.
Good, I'm not the only one that read it that way... Hopefully RMS clarifies this in his replies. -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
