Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pointless. I think it's pointless to provide a freedom which already > given and cannot be removed.
Do you think we already have the right to modify invariant text in the GFDL? My only point is that the analogy between books (which may or may not be free, depending on their license) and works under the GFDL is fundamentally flawed. I thought I could keep from getting sucked into this.... Serves me right, I guess. -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03
