Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > * Richard Stallman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030927 17:16]: > > This policy has existed as long as our web site. The links to such > > sites were mistakes; I found out about them as a result of the recent > > discussion, but the removal of these links has nothing to do with > > that; we are just following our policy. If you find anything on > > www.gnu.org that doesn't follow this policy, please report it to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Well, we can say exactly the same for Debian, just substitute "web > site" with Debian, "links" with "inclusion", .... > > However, Debian discourages the usage of non-free software, but the > FSF encourages the usage of non-free documentation. So, it's obvious > who has more reasons to remove something.
PLEASE try to understand that different definition of important freedom involved here. You should said instead: However, Debian discourages the usage of non-free software according to Debian and GNU but the FSF encourages the usage of free documentation according to GNU, non-free according to Debian. That way, things are less obvious. But I wonder which goal we are reaching with these "removing" games anyway. -- Mathieu Roy Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org Not a native english speaker: http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english