* Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-28 16:35]: > > A good candidate would also be familiar with debian-legal's analysis > > of the GFDL. Any of N Nerode, D Armstrong, or A DeRobertis would > > serve well -- Branden Robinson would, I suspect, be objectionable to > > the FSF, and Thomas Bushnell is a GNU developer as well. > > I would be happy to assist in an advisory capacity, but I am not (yet)
I would like to invite Don to participate in this committee. As per the constitution (5.1.1), I cannot make him an official delegate since he's not yet a Developer. However, Debian has always welcomed contributions from outside, and Don also fulfills all criteria we expect from Developers. He has agreed to uphold the Social Contract and the DFSG in private mail and has a GPG key which is signed by a Developer. I think it's clear from his -legal participation that he agrees with Debian's philosophy. Given Don's participation in -legal, I would like to invite him to participate in this commitee as an independet person representing the views of Debian on the FDL. He will work under the auspices of Mako Hill, who I have just appointed as Debian representative in the discussion with FSF. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
