On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 09:42:03PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > I may have misread this thread, but it sounds as if you are trying to > > ignore that such an absurdity exists, rather than fix it. > > Now I confess to being a little slack in the concept of software freedon > (for instance I use things like pine and mplayer which are just "free > enough") but I recognize that it is the main goal of the Debian project. > > What I've been saying is the BTS is the wrong place for solving this > problem.
Your package has the Official Use Logo in it, and strong consensus is that that logo is not allowed in main. The proper and expected course of action upon finding that logo in main is to file an RC bug against it to have it removed. If you disagree, and believe that logo should be allowed in main, then indeed the proper place to discuss having the trademark policy changed is not the BTS, and you can attempt to take steps to change the situation if you like. However, in the meantime the RC bug is still correct and should be fixed, or (if you refuse to adhere to both the Social Contract and the license on the Official Use logo), remain open. -- Glenn Maynard