Scripsit "Franck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The licence would not be so bad. The only restriction is about the
> redistribution of binaries wich would be restricted. Windows binaries
> distribution would be forbidden,
I think such a restriction is inherently incompatible with DFSG-freedom.
> >From the GNU/Linux point of view, the licence is like GPL. Only windows
> and other non free operating system would be restricted.
That does not make sense. The GPL allows one to build and distribute
binaries for non-free operating systems. Take away that freedom, and
what's left is not the GPL anymore, and not "like" it in any real sense.
--
Henning Makholm "In my opinion, this child don't
need to have his head shrunk at all."
