Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Måns Rullgård) > >> I know that is how law works. I just find it strange, that the GPL is >> so explicit on this point, and yet doesn't bother to clarify at all >> what a "derived work" might be, just to take an example. > > It's on purpose: The GPL wants as much as possible to be derived > works.
Of the FSF wants it that way. The problem is that they consider it immoral if a commercial company uses similar reasoning. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED]