On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:13:29AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Cf. Jesux. > > ...which has gone for some years without attracting anyone who is both > pious enough and clueful enough to develop it. > > I find this inverse correlation suggestive. :)
Or, it could be that Jesux wasn't really meant seriously. Go to the Jesux home page and click on the word Jesux in the section title "What is Jesux?". You'll see a real explanation. Given that, it's damn cool. :-) - Jimmy Kaplowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
