Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Mon, Oct 18, 2004: > No sourcecode bits: > http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/thread/20021106.222149.24f92b22.en.html
Quite interesting, although related to code running on the host, most of the thread is interesting. > In the context of DSP Binaries: > http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/thread/20030922.064726.2833dd35.en.html Interesting, and particularly this: <http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20030924.002544.1f7d5160.en.html> (where it is stated that if the source has been lost, binary is the preferred form of modification, which could eventually match the Sagem case) > And the incredibly gargantuan keep non-free proposal thread: > http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/thread/20040129.052350.5b5e7192.en.html It's 3am, I won't read that one! ;) > And finally: > http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_003 and > http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_004 Hmm that's a strong commitment of Debian, and I can't argue against that. Anyway, my initial goal was only to report some history of Sagem with this driver, and stating that Pierre Machard cann't reply to this right now. I'm really sorry I re-started a long-discussed troll again, and I'm sad Debian won't provide support for a lot of hardware in a close future. Regards, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>