* Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041028 16:25]: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 01:20:12AM -0400, Michael Poole wrote: > > In the goal of seeking consistency, I think this requires mass bug > > filing against packages with unmet dependencies, including:
> We have traditionally ignored boot loaders because they're outside > our scope. The reason they're outside our scope is not because we don't > treat them as software but that we can't take control of a system without > using a boot loader. Ah, and the different to firmware is? I was considering to support removal of firmware from main, but your reason changes my mind. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
