On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:04:52PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote: > Subversion has some clauses in its license that seemed very questionable to > me. Here they are for your convenience: > > 3. The end-user documentation included with the redistribution, if > any, must include the following acknowledgment: "This product includes > software developed by CollabNet (http://www.Collab.Net/)." > Alternately, this acknowledgment may appear in the software itself, if > and wherever such third-party acknowledgments normally appear.
X-Oz all over again. It is DFSG-free and GPL-incompatible. Subversion inherited this idiocy from apache, I think. It does not, and can not, use any GPLed works. > 4. The hosted project names must not be used to endorse or promote > products derived from this software without prior written > permission. For written permission, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standard BSD clause 4. Stupid and harmless. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature