* D. Starner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > But almost no one, if given a choice of the binary or the assembly language > to edit, would choose the binary. At the very least, the assembly would be > invaluable to deciphering the details of the firmware, and I suspect many > programmers would write a Q&D assembler to use the assembly if there were > no free assemblers for the target.
It's not like there's a whole lot of difference between the assembly and
the binary in this case. Write a Q&D disassembler and extract the
assembly if you want.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
