On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 01:32:44AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > >You snapped at me for not being willing to do the footwork, despite > >being willing to bring up a possible issue--which seemed to be saying > >[crap] > > As far as I know, I have not spoken to you to "snap". If you infer > that from my written words, I suggest reading them again calmly and > slowly. It was not my intention for them to be a "snap".
"This needless work must be done to make you happy; you are not willing to do this work?" Call it what you like. > Also, it is easy to invent words to disagree with, but not really > helpful. I think my question was simply a question about your role in > this discussion. You say it is up to the list to decide if there is a > problem, yet you seem to insist that there is a problem worth asking > about. Why? I see a license with a clause that both I and Henning [1] found potentially questionable, so I brought it to the attention of the rest of the list. I'm not going to waste any more time reading this subthread; you're bordering on trolling by snipping my text with "[crap]". If you don't want to spend your time evaluating this license, please don't do so. [1] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Glenn Maynard
