On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 10:24:03PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:52:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > the ultimate conclusion is that the QPL is not free, any time you've > > > spent trying to delay examination of this license can only hurt ocaml's > > > chances of remaining in the archive. > > > Well, did i try to delay examination ? I posted with my doubts about the > > first > > summary conclusion, and was ignored. This hardly seams like a delaying > > tactic > > on my part. > > It is my impression that your comments are intended to discourage this > discussion from taking place before sarge's release.
Nope, just the expression of my fear that this will happen in a way that let me no choice but to remove it from sarge, due to time constraints. > > I also contacted upstream, let's see what he will say to it, i doubt it will > > be positive though. > > I hope it may be; but if not, I hope we can at least have a productive > discussion with upstream about these concerns over the license -- more > productive than this in-house discussion seems to have been so far. Well, let's see if they respond to me, not entirely sure in these days of french vacations though. Friendly, Sven Luther
