MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are we sure that follows DFSG yet? FSF have been a little patchy about > broad software patent termination clauses, IMO, which is probably > partly because software patents are unfair and no software should be > patented.
The presence of a license termination clause merely allows the license to fall back to a state that we'd consider free in the first place (though I expect Brian to turn up in a moment to complain that losing your patent license means you can't distribute it under the same license any more...) -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
