On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 05:36:29PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > >>>The license looks OK to me, with the possible exception that it says > >>>"obtaining, using and/or copying this work" implies acceptance of the > >>>license.
> > I think it sets a bad precedent to wave such language into a > > list of licenses we accept as DFSG-free without at least asking the > > upstream authors to remove this wording. Why don't we do this: I'll write up a summary of the license, and note that we think that works released under the license would, barring complications, be free. I'll also add a suggestion to drop the use language. How does that sound? ~ESP