Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 04:15:59PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 12:24:31PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: >> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 10:39:39PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: >> > > I'm not sure that this clause necessarily passes the DFSG, but it's >> > > clear that the OSI has made a good and, in my opinion, successful >> > > effort to clean >> > > it up. It's neither fair nor correct to say that nothing has >> > > changed. >> > >> > It's still non-free for the same reasons, so nothing relevant has >> > changed. >> >> You mean that you still believe it's non-free because nothing relevant >> to your reasons has changed, and you're pretending that other >> perspectives don't exist. > > Irrelevant by the law of limiting factors. But I haven't seen anybody > seriously advance any other positions. You haven't been reading my postings?
-- This space intentionally left blank.