Scripsit Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 10:02:10PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > It's not a complete defense, by the way - a smart patent owner would > > just try to sue everybody else *but* the copyright holder who uses the > > code instead. > The OSL 2.1's clause causes termination if you allege patent violation > in the work against any licensee. OK. -- Henning Makholm "It was intended to compile from some approximation to the M-notation, but the M-notation was never fully defined, because representing LISP functions by LISP lists became the dominant programming language when the interpreter later became available."