Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Excluding a singleton name is fine. I'd even go so far as to say any >> > excluding any countable set is fine. Excluding an uncountable class of >> > names is not. >> >> First of all, let me first say that I agree that DFSG4 can lead to >> permitting rather annoying name change clauses, such as this one. >> However, before you attack this particular wording, let me quote from >> the Apache license: >> > 5. Products derived from this software may not be called "Apache", >> > nor may "Apache" appear in their name, without prior written >> > permission of the Apache Software Foundation. >> >> We might actually want to ship Apache... :) > > Right, this is where the PHP license was first copied from, and which > I later copied. I just had to change the name of the license.
Clearly Debian does regard that license as free. I'm confused about why a product derived from that is shipped a "apache". Has anyone from Debian talked to the ASF about this? -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]