** Raul :: > On 8/2/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm just telling you how it looks to me, and pointing you to where I > > got what evidence I have so that you can judge for yourself. The FSF > > is notoriously unforthcoming about their financial dealings, and the > > cash flows involved are not chump change (see the numbers disclosed by > > Jamie Zawinski in the Lucid Emacs saga). Whether or not you think RMS > > and Eben Moglen are cashing in personally (about which I have no > > evidence), if you are willing to take their uncorroborated claims > > about the legal strategy at the heart of their enterprise at face > > value, you are a more trusting man than I. > > This sounds like something appropriate for the scandal column of a > tabloid. But what's the relevance of this issue to debian-legal?
IMHO its relevance to d-l is that, if such suspicions are indeed founded, the FSF GPL FAQ should not be taken by face value and that Debian should re-evaluate its position about GPL and linking. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]