On 9/9/05, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Part of the issue with the existing framework of personal jurisdiction is > that we don't seem to have a clear idea what it actually is. I haven't seen > any links to documents explaining how jurisdiction is actually determined > in real life cases. Michael Poole's link from elsewhere in the thread is > the closest thing, but it's unclear to me how exactly this would work in > real world situations. Since the actual framework remains a mystery to me, > I see issues with declaring that the framework is sufficient and doesn't > need to be modified by a license. > > I've googled looking for examples of how a venue is determined normally in > international cases, but to no avail as of yet, but I'll keep looking. Some > real data would help here.
A real-world example, mostly about trademark rather than copyright or contract, and not international -- but interstate and inter-circuit, defended pro se, and documented out the yin-yang: http://www.taubmansucks.com/ . Cheers, - Michael