On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:28:36AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > I mean the *developer* must comply with both licenses, eg if you d/l > > under the GPL and MIT, then the developer must still put the written > > offer for source code and meet all the distribution requirements of > > the GPL, but anyone else can choose between the GPL and the MIT > > license. > In opened software, "We are all developers".
I think he meant to say "the copyright holder". In free software, we are not all the copyright holder. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
