Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That is completely irrelevant. The FSF doesn't use the DFSG as freeness >> guidelines. > > But the DFSG are intended to be a more detailed description of what free > software (a term initially defined by the FSF) is. If the DFSG are > wildly divergent from the FSF's viewpoint, we need to figure out how and > why. Having two different definitions of free software does nothing to > help the community.
Argh, sorry. This should have been on -legal -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
