[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >What you're trying to prevent is clear, it's just not necessary to use >a license to do this. Consider the following: Debian decides to >distribute works containing your font. The original upstream >disappears. A bug is discovered in the font, and Debian needs to fix >it. We can no longer distribute a fixed version of the font that >interoperates seamlessly with existing user's documents because we're >required to change the name of the font. Yes, and this is considered a feature. Usually existing documents should not break because a font is changed, even if this fixes a bug.
>In the case where we introduce a change that breaks the end-user >documents, end-users are (hopefully) intelligent enough to realize >that they've gotten a version that is broken, and go about tracking >down the version that they actually want. You cannot install at the same time two fonts with the same name, and anyway you should not force users to do this. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]