Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 13:43 -0800 schrieb Walter Landry: > Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[documentation license] > > Ok. Here my suggestion: > > > > /------------------ > > > Copyright (C) .... > > > [..] > > \------------------ > > > > I included your suggestions and changed "documentation" to "software" in > > item 3.) of the conditions list. Better? > > Better. The no-warranty clause should also say "software" instead of > "documentation". Otherwise, I think you're good to go. Done. The latest is http://cvs.wgdd.de/cgi-bin/cvsweb/fglrx_man/COPYING?rev=1.5. May I ask one further question? I want to release the autogen.sh script, the Makefile and configure script and the other stuff without any limitation. The macros itself are licensed under a all-permissive license (inspired by the autoconf-archive package). Is this all-permissive license /------------- > Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification, > are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright > notice and this notice are preserved. \------------- ok for Makefile(s), configure scripts, ...? Or is it better to release them into public domain? I don't think, that I should claim any rights on them. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]