Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Hi. A newly approved IETF document contains reference code for SHA-2, >>and they propose to use the following license: > >>Is this DFSG-free? > It looks fine to me, but if it's still a draft then I think it would be > useful to use a wording less vague than "misleading author or version > information".
Suggestions? The "author information" seem clear to me, but I have no idea what the "version information" refer to. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
