Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Or that the GR changed the DFSG, and the proponents managed to > browbeat the secretary into not requiring a 3:1 majority.
Well, fortunately 1) the winning option did have a 3:1 majority and 2) the option requiring a 3:1 majority did not reach even a simple majority. You can of course argue that the voters might vote differently based on the majority requirement. I personally doubt that and would like any such arguments to include some sort of proof. -- * Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) * * PGP public key available @ http://www.iki.fi/killer * -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
