Ed Hill writes: > On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 23:10 -0500, Michael Poole wrote: > > This kind of licensing conflict is a release-critical bug in the > > package under Debian Policy. The ideal solution for Debian is exactly > > what you suggested in the bug comments: work with the upstream > > maintainer to sort out license incompatibilities. Poorer solutions > > are to change just the Debian package by finding compatibly-licensed > > alternatives or ripping out the conflicting code. > > Hi Michael, > > Please pardon my Debian-ignorance, but where is the correct place to > "file this bug"?
The email method at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting is probably the easiest way to submit it. Judging from packages.debian.org, Debian's current version of the eterm package is 0.9.3-1, and the bug would be of "serious" Severity:. Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]