dtufs writes: > > That's true, but you don't get to stake the moral > > high ground *after* replying at the same level. > > I wasn't at the same level. I just stated my opinion > on how things work in the real world. In contrast, the > other poster had directly insulted the person who > wrote the license. I think there's a difference.
I made an assessment of the license's traits. I have no idea who wrote the license, and made no comment about that person's (or those people's) actual knowledge. To quote myself: "The license shows many signs of being written by someone with just enough knowledge to be legally dangerous." Regardless of the actual subject of my quote, I do not think it is an insult to remark that someone is not an expert in matters of law. Even lawyers specialize, and a family law practitioner may not be particularly well-versed in IP or contract law. Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
