On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 02:55:31PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > (Context: while hunting for an RC bug to fix, I fell on #587668 and then > asked > for advice on #debian-release, where a discussion was held. Here's my summary > of > the issue.)
Hi Didier, I stumbled upon these bug logs myself during last week-end. IANAL, but FWIW my own summary of the issue is the same as yours, thanks for saving my time in posting it here yourself first :-) Let me just comment on a specific option, which lays pretty much at the intersection of SPI/DPL responsibilities. > d) get the DOUL-with license changed in time for Squeeze, I've been looking into this option, as I would have loved to simply propose "let's re-license the 'with' logo under DOUL". Unfortunately, there are concerns that doing so could be interpreted as "naked licensing" [1] the Debian trademark. I still hope to find some DFSG-free way out of it, but the issue looks tricky and I seriously doubt it can be solved in time for Squeeze. Cheers. [1] http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Naked_license -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, | . |. I've fans everywhere ti resta John Fante -- V. Caposella .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
