On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:20:46 -0400 Michael Hanke <m...@debian.org> wrote:
> [I've set reply-to to me, because I'm not subscribed to this list] > > Karl Goetz <k...@kgoetz.id.au> wrote: > > > > > > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/slicer/slicer_3.6.3~svn16075-2/slicer.copyright > > > > I find the slicer licence really dificult to understand, but i guess > > we're heading down a tangent by discussing it. > > No, actually not. > > > Could you include the actual licence terms for the package you are > > working on, perhaps with its itp bug number? > > There is not ITP yet, because it depends on the outcome of this > discussion. The license terms in question are identical with slicer's > -- except for the name of the software. Ah, i see. I'll follow up to Francesco's message then. kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
