Dear debian-legal list,

Please Cc: me as I am not subscribed to this list.

I am packaging a software containing files with the COPYING file here
attached. They have a double BSD and D&R, but the text below "BSD
License" is in fact that of the MIT/Expat license.

What has priority in this case, the title of the license used, or the
text of the license itself? Should I consider the first license to be
really BSD, or Expat?

Note that the original author, why the lucky stiff, has disappeared, he cannot
be asked directly. These files used for unit tests, are (part of) the
"syck" project, the code of which is https://github.com/indeyets/syck.

Thank you very much for your advice.

Best regards,

Cédric
Copyright (c) 2003 why the lucky stiff

This software is subject to either of two licenses (BSD or D&R), which you can 
choose
from in your use of the code.  The terms for each of these licenses is listed 
below:

BSD License
===========

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to
deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the
rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or
sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
  
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
   
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
THE AUTHORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER 
IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN
CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

D&R (Death and Repudiation) License
===================================

This software may not be used directly by any living being.  ANY use of this
software (even perfectly legitimate and non-commercial uses) until after death
is explicitly restricted.  Any living being using (or attempting to use) this 
software
will be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

For your protection, corpses will not be punished.  We respectfully request 
that you submit your uses (revisions, uses, distributions, uses, etc.) to 
your children, who may vicariously perform these uses on your behalf.  If 
you use this software and you are found to be not dead, you will be punished 
to the fullest extent of the law.

If you are found to be a ghost or angel, you will be punished to the fullest 
extent of the law.

After your following the terms of this license, the author has vowed to 
repudiate
your claim, meaning that the validity of this contract will no longer be 
recognized.
This license will be unexpectedly revoked (at a time which is designated to be
most inconvenient) and involved heirs will be punished to the fullest extent
of the law.

Furthermore, if any parties (related or non-related) escape the punishments
outlined herein, they will be severely punished to the fullest extent of a new
revised law that (1) expands the statement "fullest extent of the law" to 
encompass
an infinite duration of infinite punishments and (2) exacts said punishments 
upon all parties (related or non-related).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to