Kay Hayen, 2012-01-05 16:37+0100: > The interesting part is contribution copyright assignment. I actually do > _not_ want Nuitka to have to stay GPLv3 when it's "ready". Then I > _definitely_ want it to have another license, with "ASF2.0" being the > current front runner. > > If i put it as "ASF2.0" too early, it would put me at a risk of loosing > the control over the direction.
Interesting. Well, as far as I know, copyright assignment is more an issue of project management, not of licensing. What you can do is clearly state that you will only integrate contributed code with such a copyright assignment, or parallel private licensing to you under the ASF. But this is sometimes not appreciated. -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo <xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu> <irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy> | `-' Debian Developer \_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/je4hni$t5t$1...@dough.gmane.org
