Kay Hayen, 2012-01-06 11:27+0100: >> I would expect, and encourage, people to fork the work and maintain it >> with the same license for all parties, without any such contributor >> agreement. > > I would normally agree with such stance. > > But why would one have the goal to keep Nuitka under GPLv3 for long, and > if the main contributors and about everybody else won't have it either?
For what I see, the right question would rather be: why would one have the goal to distribute Nuitka under GPL for a while, and then switch to Apache? I mean, honestly, your goal is weird, so seing someone fork it to maintain it under the GPL would seem pretty normal in comparison. -- ,--. : /` ) Tanguy Ortolo <xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu> <irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy> | `-' Debian Developer \_ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/je6ree$t21$1...@dough.gmane.org
