Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes: > I have looked at licenses of reverse dependencies, and I did > found some GPLv2-only packages. That caused me to dual license > the package instead of going to LGPLv3+. (GPLv2-only and > LGPLv3+ are incompatible.) I am not aware of any other license > that could pose any problem with a dual-licensed GPLv2+|LGPLv3+ > package.
I believe GPLv2+|LGPLv3+ is incompatible with GPLv2|OpenSSL-linking-exception, used in ekg2. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
