Hi, First, thanks a lot to Ian for working on this draft, which (I think) provides a nice summary of the situation around the PHP license.
On 21/08/14 at 19:49 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> (2014-08-21): > > Draft question for SFLC: > > (there are no changes since v3 apart from fixes to the numbering of > > some section cross-references) > > > > > > Some members of the Debian project have some concerns about the PHP > > licence. These worries are dismissed by other members and by relevant > > upstreams. We would like some advice. > > > > We are concerned here with the PHP 3.01 Licences, which can be > > found here: http://php.net/license/3_01.txt > > I might have missed them, but I don't think there were any replies to > Charles' question in <20140801231037.ga8...@falafel.plessy.net>. > > Who are “some members” and “we”? That's indeed a very good point, which I already raised with Ian earlier this month. Ftpmasters are the ones responsible for making decisions about acceptable software licenses in Debian. The advice provided by SFLC is extremely valuable to us, and should generally be followed, but it's still only advice. So I'll wait for Ftpmasters (Cced) to review and ACK the current draft before forwarding those questions to SFLC, to ensure that the questions accurately match and cover our concerns. Lucas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature