debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Martin Schulze
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Matthew Garrett
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Ken Arromdee
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Gustavo Noronha Silva
  • Re: GPL compatible license? Anthony DeRobertis
• 3D- C library Aranzazu Bereciartua Perez
• portaudio license Dave Cunningham
  • Re: portaudio license Henning Makholm
  • Re: portaudio license Glenn Maynard
  • Re: portaudio license Dave Cunningham
  • Re: portaudio license Glenn Maynard
  • Re: portaudio license Dave Cunningham
  • Re: portaudio license Glenn Maynard
  • Re: portaudio license Henning Makholm
  • Portaudio license Free Ekanayaka
• Re: Bug#280864: turck-mmcache: linking against php4 violates license Elizabeth Fong
• Re: [gnu.org #214407] AutoReply concerning licensing question: Re: zwiki copyright status Glenn Maynard via RT
• zwiki copyright status Bob McElrath
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Michael Poole
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Simon Michael
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Glenn Maynard
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Glenn Maynard
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Bob McElrath
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Anthony W. Youngman
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Arnoud Engelfriet
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: zwiki copyright status Arnoud Engelfriet
• turck-mmcache license violation? Andres Salomon
  • Re: turck-mmcache license violation? cascardo
  • Re: turck-mmcache license violation? Glenn Maynard
  • Re: turck-mmcache license violation? Francesco Poli
  • Re: turck-mmcache license violation? Andres Salomon
• Bug#280803: libgcc1: contains non-free GNU FDL Matthias Klose
  • Bug#280803: libgcc1: contains non-free GNU FDL Don Armstrong
• Bug#280673: apt-howto: APT HOWTO is under a non-free license Francesco Poli
• review of DK and IIM patent licenses Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: review of DK and IIM patent licenses MJ Ray
  • Re: review of DK and IIM patent licenses Matthew Garrett
  • Re: review of DK and IIM patent licenses MJ Ray
• Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Isaac Clerencia
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Don Armstrong
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Henning Makholm
  • Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Anthony DeRobertis
  • Fwd: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Isaac Clerencia
  • Re: Fwd: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue Michael Poole
• Everyone Need This Debian-laptop-request Bernice Marcus
• APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL Francesco Poli
  • Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL Josh Triplett
  • Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL Gustavo Noronha Silva
  • Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL Francesco Poli
• Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses? Juhapekka Tolvanen
  • Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses? Andrew Suffield
  • Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses? Sebastian Feltel
  • Re: Canonical list of DFSG-free licenses? MJ Ray
• Open Profanity License Juhapekka Tolvanen
  • Re: Open Profanity License Raul Miller
  • Re: Open Profanity License Florian Weimer
• Java Researchg License Juhapekka Tolvanen
  • Re: Java Researchg License Matthew Garrett
  • Re: Java Researchg License Dalibor Topic
• [jcowan@reutershealth.com: Re: Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?] Glenn Maynard
• GPL and command-line libraries Wesley W. Terpstra
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Josselin Mouette
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Wesley W. Terpstra
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Wesley W. Terpstra
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Jonathan ILIAS
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Glenn Maynard
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Tollef Fog Heen
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Raul Miller
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Wesley W. Terpstra
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Wouter Verhelst
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Frank Küster
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Andrew Suffield
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Henning Makholm
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Lewis Jardine
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Raul Miller
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Wesley W. Terpstra
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Andrew Suffield
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Henning Makholm
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Andrew Suffield
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Anthony W. Youngman
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Raul Miller
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Ken Arromdee
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Raul Miller
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Ken Arromdee
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Måns Rullgård
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Raul Miller
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Alessandro Rubini
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Andrew Suffield
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Anthony DeRobertis
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: GPL and command-line libraries David Schmitt
• Bug#278940: ITP: socket++ -- lightweight convenience library to handle low level BSD sockets in C++ Dan Weber
  • Re: Bug#278940: ITP: socket++ -- lightweight convenience library to handle low level BSD sockets in C++ Josh Triplett
  • Re: Bug#278940: ITP: socket++ -- lightweight convenience library to handle low level BSD sockets in C++ Dan Weber
  • Re: Bug#278940: ITP: socket++ -- lightweight convenience library to handle low level BSD sockets in C++ Francesco Poli
• SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Shawn Robinson
  • Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Raul Miller
  • Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Steve Langasek
  • Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Anthony W. Youngman
  • Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Michael D. Crawford
  • Re: SCO Ip right's claim on linux and SCO Intellectual Property License Program Brian Thomas Sniffen
• i wish you wehre here Holly Stout
• Our Stance on new Sender ID Revision? Martin Schulze
  • Re: Our Stance on new Sender ID Revision? Florian Weimer
  • Re: Our Stance on new Sender ID Revision? Andrew Suffield
• License for VCP Piotr Roszatycki
  • Re: License for VCP Florian Weimer
  • Re: License for VCP MJ Ray
  • Re: License for VCP Francesco Poli
  • Re: License for VCP Branden Robinson
  • Re: License for VCP Francesco Poli
• what's the story on MPEG-1 video and audio layer 1,2 licensing? Tim Olsen
  • Re: what's the story on MPEG-1 video and audio layer 1,2 licensing? Andrew Suffield
• Preferred license for forums content - Part II Sebastian Feltel
  • Re: Preferred license for forums content - Part II Andrew Suffield
  • Re: Preferred license for forums content - Part II Sebastian Feltel
  • Re: Preferred license for forums content - Part II Don Armstrong
  • Re: Preferred license for forums content - Part II Andrew Suffield
  • Re: Preferred license for forums content - Part II Sebastian Feltel
• which Debian section? Oded Shimon
  • Re: which Debian section? Michelle Konzack
  • Re: which Debian section? Josh Triplett
  • Re: which Debian section? Oded Shimon
  • Re: which Debian section? MJ Ray
• Abwesenheitsnotiz: Hi Riegert, Ulrich
• Britannica - Failed Correspondence Notification (KMM2363248C0KM) Unsubscribe from Britannica
• ITP some 13 years old code with unknown license Harald Dunkel
  • Re: ITP some 13 years old code with unknown license Ben Pfaff
  • Re: ITP some 13 years old code with unknown license Marco d'Itri
  • Re: Re: ITP some 13 years old code with unknown license Harald Dunkel
  • Re: ITP some 13 years old code with unknown license Josh Triplett
  • Re: ITP some 13 years old code with unknown license Harald Dunkel
  • Re: ITP some 13 years old code with unknown license Josh Triplett
• Your Profile Heath L. Pace
• a legal problem with 'filters' in germany martin f krafft
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany martin f krafft
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany MJ Ray
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany Raul Miller
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany Glenn Maynard
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany Florian Weimer
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany Glenn Maynard
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany Raul Miller
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany Patrick Herzig
  • Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany Marco d'Itri
• [cocoro-net]グループに参加しますか？ Yahoo!グループ
• Repondeur de <devlpt@ifrance.com> devlpt
• Re: Re: your mail Anthony Youngman
• xchat is now shareware in windoze Giacomo A. Catenazzi
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze John Goerzen
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Joachim Breitner
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Michael Poole
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Lewis Jardine
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Don Armstrong
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Don Armstrong
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Don Armstrong
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Don Armstrong
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Glenn Maynard
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Michael Poole
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Raul Miller
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Don Armstrong
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Henning Makholm
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Raul Miller
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Michael Poole
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Raul Miller
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Glenn Maynard
  • Re: xchat is now shareware in windoze Henning Makholm
• [no subject] Anthony Youngman
  • Re: your mail Raul Miller
• Is this software really GPL? Anthony W. Youngman
  • Re: Is this software really GPL? Raul Miller
  • Re: Is this software really GPL? Raul Miller
  • Re: Is this software really GPL? Glenn Maynard

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]