Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:32:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307639: fixed in lintian 1.23.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 12:12:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 04 05:12:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DTIkK-0006mg-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 05:12:56 -0700
Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1DTIkJ-0005N2-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 04 May 2005 14:12:55 +0200
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 14:12:55 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please add exception: non-standard-file-perm for backupninja 
(/etc/backup.d)]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Debbugs-Cc: Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: lintian
Severity: wishlist

----- Forwarded message from Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 10:56:20 +0200
From: Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exception: non-standard-file-perm for backupninja (/etc/backup.d)
Resent-From: [email protected]


Hi,

Package backupninja expects configuration files in /etc/backup.d
It also enforces them to have no permissions for group and world. Therefore, 
_any package_ that needs to put files in that directory will get a
non-standard-file-perm warning from lintian. I stress the _any package_ 
part: backupninja itself does not put files there. The exception should 
apply to all packages.

Could you please add an exception to lintian to handle this case?

Cheers,

Daniel

PS: the requirement is apparent from function check_perms, line 157 of 
/usr/sbin/backupninja


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307639-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2005 15:42:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 10 08:42:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Drdwl-0000JC-00; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 08:42:23 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Drdn9-000115-00; Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:32:27 -0400
From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#307639: fixed in lintian 1.23.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 11:32:27 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8

Source: lintian
Source-Version: 1.23.10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lintian_1.23.10.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.10.dsc
lintian_1.23.10.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.10.tar.gz
lintian_1.23.10_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_1.23.10_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated lintian package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:20:42 +0200
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.23.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 lintian    - Debian package checker
Closes: 88340 253405 294894 295093 299792 307639 308569 309203 309220 311471 
317049
Changes: 
 lintian (1.23.10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The "Ah, it's LinuxTag and I still have free time!" release
 .
   * debian/control:
     + [HE] Updated description to say that we're calibrated for Policy
       version 3.6.2. As the changes between 3.6.{1,2} aren't stuff we
       (can) check, this is actually true! (Closes: #317049)
 .
   * testset/runtests:
     + [HE] Fix symlinking of original tarballs to allow run directories
       outside the lintian source tree.
 .
   * checks/control-file
     + [HE] Check for duplicated fields. (Closes: #299792)
 .
   * checks/fields:
     + [HE] Change unknown-architecture a bit: We don't complain about
       "known" non-standard archs (like amd64, ppc64, *bsd-i386) and only
       print out an info message for those. (Closes: #253405, #311471)
 .
   * checks/files:
     + [HE] Allow backupninja configuration files in /etc/backup.d/ to be
       0600. (Closes: #307639)
 .
   * checks/scripts:
     + [HE] Allow Scripts in /etc/Xsession.d/ to be not executable, as they're
       not directly called, but only sourced. (Closes: #309203)
     + [HE] Check for use of adduser and update-inetd and warn if the package
       has no (pre-)dependency on adduser/netbase. Patch by Russ Allbery,
       thanks for the work. (Closes: #308569)
     + [HE] Check for use of "." as a deprecated separator between user and
       group names in chown call. (Closes: #88340)
     + [HE] Fix to work $interpreter-script-but-no-$pkg-dep with more than one
       dependency if needed. First use case is depending on build-essential
       to provide /usr/bin/make. (Closes: #294894)
     + [HE] Add lefty as a valid interpreter and check for a correct dependency
       on graphviz. (Closes: #295093)
 .
   * checks/shared-libs:
     + [HE] Don't allow non-PIC shared libraries. This conforms to the new
       etch release policy. Thanks for the report and patch to Kurt Roeckx
       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. (Closes: #309220)
Files: 
 8f474879521b2c86c26f8f8e781a45cb 780 devel optional lintian_1.23.10.dsc
 3d9a59329a9d11dde13b3cb861426c9f 257919 devel optional lintian_1.23.10.tar.gz
 24609039d9928f3bfe669ae726e7762b 226022 devel optional lintian_1.23.10_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkLROX0ACgkQmO5zOp3h7rHeNQCfTlc4MqCLmaGk/266WDfC+Pwv
1IEAn1Pup/ADIiIeghQYeMe+LKtNpufg
=VVoz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to