Russ Allbery wrote: [...] > > We do still have a memory leak in binary packages, unfortunately. I think > it's growing slower, but it's still growing. I suspect something deep in > the guts that's leaking memory for all types of packages. >
What about making lintian report the memory usage after each package, that way we could have a slightly better overview of the situation (say memory is only leaked when packages foo and bar are processed, what do they have in common and what do they do not have in common with package moo?). Another possibility is reporting it after each check script, but that'd be too much information (and won't be of much help because of data caching). On a partially unrelated topic, what about disabling the pgp/gpg signature check on lintian.d.o? it just consumes time and space in lintian.log and won't find anything without the keyrings and gpg setup. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
