Raphael Geissert <atomo64+deb...@gmail.com> writes: > I don't know why I had the idea that it returned the return code of the > process. But taking a look at it again, I think we want && here, so that > 1 is returned only if none of the processes had to be SIGKILLed.
Good point. Fixed. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
