Raphael Geissert <geiss...@debian.org> writes: > I was working on that very same bug and had the very same patch. What > stopped me from committing was that there _is_ a build-dependency on ant > (ORed, yes).
> So it looks like there's another bug that needs to be fixed. Since you are > more familiar with the Lintian::Relation module, could you please check > that? thanks! Lintian::Relation is functioning correctly. A dependency on ant | ant1.7 does not satisfy a requirement for ant, since the ant1.7 branch could be taken. (This is more obvious if you consider that from Lintian's perspective the dependency could be ant | make, which wouldn't guarantee that a binary named ant is available.) The correct fix is to make Lintian aware of the full set of options that could provide the required binary. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r5neprhz....@windlord.stanford.edu
