Russ Allbery wrote: > While I agree with this message that idiomatic English would call for > different phrasing in a lot of places, I think correcting "allows to" to > "allows one to" would be acceptable, if not ideal, phrasing in every > example given there.
This one was on my ToDo list and had the following temp commit: +(?i)allows to||allows _object_ to +(?i)requires to||requires _object_ to +(?i)helps to||helps _object_ to +(?i)permits to||permits _object_ to I don't remember why I wrote 'object' (now that I think about it should probably be s/object/subject/) Not sure if using '_subject_' on the correction would be understood by everyone. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ig524r$f4...@dough.gmane.org
