On 2011-08-21 20:50, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org>, 2011-08-15, 00:36: >>> Feel free to add a new separate check if that results in more >>> maintainable code. :) >> >> Okay, updated patch attached. > > I renamed the check to source-copyright (from source-copyright-file, > which was too long :P), fixed a few minor bugs, added tests. >
Hey. --- a/t/COVERAGE +++ b/t/COVERAGE @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -Last generated 2011-08-17 -Coverage: 697/915 (76.17%), w. legacy tests: 820/915 (89.62%) +Last generated 2011-08-21 +Coverage: 712/930 (76.56%), w. legacy tests: 835/930 (89.78%) When I run private/update-coverage after applying the patch I get +Coverage: 704/930 (75.70%), w. legacy tests: 835/930 (88.92%) plus it lists 7 new source-copyright tags that are not covered. Is a part of this patch missing? The patch carries 7 source-copyright tests (boilerplate-uri, missing, ood-uri [odd?], symlink, unknown-uri, unversioned-uri and wiki-uri) in t/tests ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e521913.3060...@thykier.net