On jeu., 2012-06-14 at 10:02 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-06-13 08:25, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > Package: lintian > > Version: 2.5.8 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hi, > > > > lintian returns me two warnings for lightdm package: > > > > lintian > > /home/corsac/debian/pkg-xfce/scripts/pbuilder/xfce/build-sid-amd64-trunk/lightdm_1.2.2-2_amd64.changes > > W: liblightdm-qt-2-0: dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink > > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblightdm-qt-2.so.0.0.0 > > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblightdm-qt.so > > W: lightdm: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/dm-tool > > W: liblightdm-gobject-1-0: dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink > > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblightdm-gobject-1.so.0.0.0 > > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblightdm-gobject.so > > > > but those are not -dev packages so I miss the point? > > > > Regards, > > It is an implementation detail that it is (currently?) emitted on > library packages rather than -dev packages. You are not the first to be > surprised to by this and I have clarified this in a recent commit[1]. :)
Thanks for the clarification. > > > > This bug is basically #675832, except I apparently broke the patch > there, so it is still present for your package on the master branch. > > You are getting this tag because your qt-dev package ships: > > * liblightdm-qt-2.so -> liblightdm-qt-2.so.0.0.0 > > and Lintian (incorrectly) expects you to ship: > > * liblightdm-qt.so -> liblightdm-qt-2.so.0.0.0 > > (similar story for the -gobject-dev package). > Ok. So feel free to close it with the clarification upload or merge it with #675832 :) Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
